home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=90TT1668>
- <title>
- June 25, 1990: Focal Points
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1990
- June 25, 1990 Who Gives A Hoot?
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- BOOKS, Page 72
- Focal Points
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <qt>
- <l>FAMILY PICTURES</l>
- <l>by Sue Miller</l>
- <l>Harper & Row; 389 pages; $19.95</l>
- </qt>
- <p> The thumping message in Sue Miller's previous novel, The
- Good Mother, was that society has a double standard when
- judging parental behavior. The man who cats around is not
- necessarily a bad father, but if a woman (even one who is
- estranged from her spouse) has a sleep-over friend, she is a
- bad mother. The issue can be overstated or, as was the case
- with The Good Mother, overprogrammed. Yet the underlying truth
- cannot be quibbled away.
- </p>
- <p> Much the same could be said about Miller's second novel,
- Family Pictures. The message is that women with autistic
- children have been made to bear the burden and the guilt for
- the misfortune. Appropriately, the setting is Chicago, home of
- the late psychologist Bruno Bettelheim, whose judgmental views
- on the causes of autism hang over the Eberhardt family.
- Underscoring the theme is David Eberhardt, an orthodox Freudian
- psychiatrist. Mother Lainey navigates with less theory and
- more emotion--no small undertaking with six children,
- including the autistic Randall.
- </p>
- <p> The narrator, daughter Nina, is a photographer. Hence the
- novel's title, which suggests the documentation of the
- Eberhardt chronicle from 1940 to 1985. Nina's task is to make
- sense out of the Randall effect. It emerges slowly in the weave
- of story lines about the lives and times of Nina's parents and
- siblings. Her climactic musing over the family photos arranged
- before her: "Which had the most power? Freud? That analytic
- version of my parents' life, which insisted that Randall--and
- their misery--had its source in my mother's wackiness and
- should be struggled against, fought, cured? Or the
- annunciations, which said, in effect, that Randall was holy,
- that the failure was my father's in not accepting what was a
- given, what was fate."
- </p>
- <p> Randall's fate is that he is seldom more than a wobbly focus
- of contention around which Miller examines the enigmas of
- matrimonial and blood ties. The breakup of the Eberhardt
- marriage and the difficulties of the children as they come of
- age in the counterculture 1960s and self-absorbed '70s are
- plausible with or without the issue of autism. In fact, when
- Miller is at her most perceptive and sympathetic, Randall,
- Bettelheim and Freud seem incidental baggage to this otherwise
- affecting family novel about changing values and resilient
- affections.
- </p>
- <p>By R.Z. Sheppard.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-